Home
Search
Login
Register
Show Posts
1
General Discussion / Keri Commentary - second meeting: Acts 1 & 2
« on: February 15, 2016, 02:20:42 pm »
This Act was a bit odd in my opinion, because the first scene kind of drops us in the middle of a story. At least with Much Ado About Nothing, they had just come back from war, but here, it is just another day with Duke Orsino trying to impress a girl. They also don't spend enough time on the whole shipwreck plot. Where were they going? Who else was on the ship? What happened? All these questions are left unanswered and the characters quickly transition into the scheme of dressing Viola as a man named Cesario so that she could work for Orsino.
The love triangle that appears to be growing between Orsino, Olivia, and Viola becomes apparent in scene 5, when Olivia tells tells Viola that she will no longer accept Orsino's acts of love, "unless, perchance, [Viola, dressed as Cesario,] come to [Olivia] again" (1.5.278). It is inferred that Olivia has developed feelings for Cesario (Viola), which is confirmed after Viola leaves, and Olivia is by herself.
I also noticed, with the third scene of Act 1 that a pattern of wit has emerged in Shakespeare's writing. Both Beatrice and Maria are outspoken and witty, but neither are really a main character. This shows that even when women are portrayed as independent and strong, they are cast to the side, and the modest women who act as they're supposed to, like Olivia has shown us thus far, are placed as the main characters, almost as if Shakespeare is highlighting which lady you should be acting like.
In Act 2, I think that there are two big points of discussion. The first being the controversial implication of Antionio's romantic feelings for Sebastian. Antonio says to Sebastian, "if you will not murder me for my love, let me be your servant" (2.1.30-1). The diction of this sentence heavily implies that Antionio's feelings for Sebastian are far stronger than mere friendliness. This seems extremely risky considering that gay relationships have been frowned upon for all of history, they still are today. Why does Shakespeare add this relationship to the story? What purpose does it serve? Is he trying to teach us something?
The second thing that should be addressed is in scene 4 when Orsino claims that a woman is incapable of loving as much as a man loves. I think that this adds to the topic of gender roles and sexism that are obviously present in this story. Is Shakespeare trying to put women down, or is he advocating that women are treated badly?
The love triangle that appears to be growing between Orsino, Olivia, and Viola becomes apparent in scene 5, when Olivia tells tells Viola that she will no longer accept Orsino's acts of love, "unless, perchance, [Viola, dressed as Cesario,] come to [Olivia] again" (1.5.278). It is inferred that Olivia has developed feelings for Cesario (Viola), which is confirmed after Viola leaves, and Olivia is by herself.
I also noticed, with the third scene of Act 1 that a pattern of wit has emerged in Shakespeare's writing. Both Beatrice and Maria are outspoken and witty, but neither are really a main character. This shows that even when women are portrayed as independent and strong, they are cast to the side, and the modest women who act as they're supposed to, like Olivia has shown us thus far, are placed as the main characters, almost as if Shakespeare is highlighting which lady you should be acting like.
In Act 2, I think that there are two big points of discussion. The first being the controversial implication of Antionio's romantic feelings for Sebastian. Antonio says to Sebastian, "if you will not murder me for my love, let me be your servant" (2.1.30-1). The diction of this sentence heavily implies that Antionio's feelings for Sebastian are far stronger than mere friendliness. This seems extremely risky considering that gay relationships have been frowned upon for all of history, they still are today. Why does Shakespeare add this relationship to the story? What purpose does it serve? Is he trying to teach us something?
The second thing that should be addressed is in scene 4 when Orsino claims that a woman is incapable of loving as much as a man loves. I think that this adds to the topic of gender roles and sexism that are obviously present in this story. Is Shakespeare trying to put women down, or is he advocating that women are treated badly?